ATTORNEYS AT LAW
The views expressed below are those of our clients and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ambulance Chasers & Sons. In most cases, we wish they did not reflect anything at all.
"I was referred to Ambulance Chasers & Sons by my solicitor, who has since been struck off. I cannot comment on whether the two events are connected, as I am currently subject to a superinjunction I did not request and do not understand. Five stars."— J.P., Dewsbury, legally prohibited from further comment
"They told me they could get my speeding ticket thrown out. Technically they were correct. It was thrown out by Woking Magistrates' Court when the Crown Prosecution Service withdrew it, citing 'the wholly disproportionate involvement of federal law enforcement.' I now have a file at the FBI instead."— D.W., Rotherham, on a list
"I asked them to help with a noise complaint. My neighbour's lawyer, the local council, the county court, the High Court, INTERPOL, and the U.S. State Department are now all involved. My neighbour and I have reconciled. We are united in our desire to see this firm dissolved."— M.F., Bridgend, still paying legal fees
"I engaged Ambulance Chasers & Sons to challenge a noise abatement notice. I wish to state for the record that the low-frequency grunting was within acceptable parameters and that the complaints from 400 metres away were exaggerated. Mr Chaser's decision to involve INTERPOL was, in my professional opinion, disproportionate. His decision to involve the wildebeest was unexpected. The matter remains unresolved. The grunting continues."— H.T., Dorking, no longer on speaking terms with the Integration Officer
"Mr Chaser argued that my expired Oyster card constituted fare evasion on an international scale. TfL issued a statement saying they 'did not seek and do not support' the involvement of the Department of Homeland Security. The Court noted that Mr Chaser's submissions had 'the air of a man who has recently discovered the concept of jurisdiction and wishes to test its limits.' I paid the £7.50 fare and a $48,000 legal bill."— Anonymous, by necessity
Testimonials have been edited for clarity. All clients have requested anonymity. Some have requested removal. Those requests are currently being treated as legal matters by the firm, generating additional billable hours.